Our view: let your hiring certainty guide the purchase
Oyster is worth a close look when your headcount is predictable and you can make good use of an annual seat agreement. If your hiring dates are uncertain, compare monthly proposals from both providers before committing to discounted capacity you may not use.
Remote is a credible option to evaluate on the clarity of its local employment proposal and its billing process. Oyster also needs to meet those tests.
For a team with only a handful of international employees, a manageable process matters. Ask how often HR will need to intervene, what finance must approve and where an employee goes for an answer. A service that fits your capacity is worth more than functions that sit unused.
How the fees, commitments, cash needs and benefits compare
Our provider ratings reflect our recommendation order for providers overall. “Not rated” means we haven’t published a rating for that provider.
Question
Remote
Oyster
Decision
Displayed EOR fee
Remote
USD 599 annual contract; USD 699 standard monthly
Oyster
USD 699 per employee/month, monthly billing
Decision
Commitment to investigate
Remote
Compare annual-contract and monthly offers; confirm invoice timing and reserve terms
Oyster
Annual seats priced by quote; prepaid, non-refundable and reusable
Decision
Cash requirement
Remote
Ask about prefunding and any reserve
Oyster
Ask about prefunding, deposit and annual payment
Decision
Employee package
Remote / Oyster
Check before signing: confirm compare actual eligibility, coverage, employee contributions and effective dates in writing.
Compare Remote’s annual and monthly rates with Oyster’s monthly and annual billing options for the same employee. The US dollar figures cover provider service fees. Salary and employer costs are additional. Remote refers to Remote.com throughout this article.
Remote’s annual commitment does not establish annual prepayment. Its standard monthly price is billed on active usage; obtain the annual offer’s invoice schedule in writing.
A cheaper annual rate needs occupied seats
Oyster’s annual EOR plan takes upfront, nonrefundable payment for reusable seats. Quarterly or semiannual payment can be available at a higher per-seat rate. Ask which payment schedule applies to your team.
Work out the annual service cost against the hiring plan you can defend today. Include likely delays, vacancies and cancelled roles. Keep the optimistic hiring forecast in a separate column. A rate that looks attractive at full occupancy may look quite different if several seats remain empty for months.
Ask both providers what happens if an employee leaves midway through the agreement. Can you reassign the purchased service? Does the country or start date of a replacement affect pricing? When does the commitment renew, and how much notice is needed to change it?
These questions are especially important for a small team: one delayed hire can represent a large share of the planned workforce. Budget for flexibility deliberately instead of treating it as a free feature.
Map the cash needed before the first payday
Oyster distinguishes the refundable deposit from payroll prefunding and the later settlement. Remote also issues prefunding and reconciliation invoices. Ask for each employee’s reserve calculation separately from the amount required for the next payroll.
Ask each provider for a dated payment schedule covering the first three months. Add the service payment, salary funding, employer contributions, benefits and any retained balance. Then ask finance whether those payments fit the company’s normal approval cycle.
Separate three figures in your evaluation: recurring operating cost, cash paid in advance and refundable money held by the provider. Combining them into one “monthly cost” hides the difference between an expense and a cash commitment.
Also ask what happens if an estimated payroll amount is too high or too low. Your team needs to understand how adjustments appear and when a credit can be used.
Make the offer understandable to the employee
Oyster offers local and global benefits. Ask which package the employee can enroll in and which premiums the employer must pay.
Ask both providers for the plan documents relevant to the hire. Compare the employer contribution, employee contribution, eligibility, dependents, exclusions and dates. If the candidate asks a question, note whether your HR team can answer it from the materials or must open another support request.
For ongoing support, ask each provider to demonstrate a realistic employee issue, such as an unexpected payslip deduction. Who receives the question? When does your team become involved? How can the employee see whether the issue is progressing?
Do not equate a responsive sales conversation with a tested support service. Request the support commitments and escalation route attached to your actual plan.
Two small-team decisions
Hypothetical example: four established employees staying on an EOR. Headcount is stable, and the employer expects to keep the arrangement for at least the next year. Obtain an Oyster annual quote, compare it with Remote’s proposal and review the full cash schedule. Oyster’s purchasing model may suit the forecast if the package and service also meet the team’s needs.
Hypothetical example: two planned hires, with a third dependent on funding. The company does not yet know when all candidates will start. Compare monthly offers first. A modest discount is not persuasive if obtaining it means paying for capacity the company cannot confidently use. Remote or Oyster could win this purchase depending on the final terms.
Before deciding, request the process and charges for an employee leaving, moving country or transferring to your own entity. Ask who coordinates the change and which documents your company must supply.
If Oyster’s fee is the obstacle, compare Deel and Oyster’s starting offers using the country, benefit package and commitment in your proposal.
Evidence behind the comparison
The official pages linked here were checked on 3 October 2026. Product terms are provider-published; recommendations and examples are editorial analysis. Our comparison draws on our hands-on tests of both providers. Use the published starting fees for a first comparison and a quote for the final cost.